I teased this a little in my last post and said that just because we don't know something doesn't mean we, particularly here in The United States, as able to ignore it. We, I am speaking white American here, have so many excuses for why we don't know things.
Some of them are objectively, sadly true. As a child, I desperately wanted to learn history--I grew up in a family that put a great emphasis on history, although my mom (now 90) and I have been talking about all the things she did not know as well. I was disappointed that we did very little "history." We learned a watered down version of "social studies." I believe that our text book had about four pages about slavery and post-slavery times, concentrating on George Washington Carver and Eli Whitney. High school was not a lot better. I am blessed in having realized early on that I was going to have to educate myself because school was not providing me with an appropriate education. I am largely self-educated, up to starting college. Much of the self-education was encouraged and reinforced by a strong Quaker community that stressed free thinking, diversity, and non-violence.
I don't think I am in the minority for having had a deficient education, even in an affluent consolidated school district. But, does that give any of us the choice to remain blissfully ignorant? Muslims say that the crowning glory God has given us is the human intellect, and I thnk we have often been sloppy with this, to our shame. This is compounded in my current teaching because I work with African immigrants, who have only recently come to the United States, in addition to learning very little history, African or American. On many days we spend much more time on history and current events in my English class than on anything else,and I consider that time well spent. Sometimes it is excruciatingly difficult and painful, but it is some of the most important work I have ever done.
So this brings us to Stamped From the Beginning. It is beautifully written, lovingly researched, and unflinchingly de-mythologizing. There is not much that I can say about this book that hasn't been said in a much more eloquent way in recent weeks, but reading it has been another corrective to the "Don't Know Much About History" that we suffer. Read it and stop and let it wash over you and then make new choices, and don't choose to be quiet anymore.
If anyone is scared by reading a dense 583 page book of "scholarship," much of it reads very smoothly. We need to use our wonderful human intellect. If you want to ease into this work, there is a wonderful podcast called Scene on Radio (Season Three) that is about Seeing White. It covers a lot of the same history and background in a compelling and fast-moving way.
I have also been reading Imani Perry's Breathe: A Letter To My Sons. In many ways that has been a tougher read for me because it is achingly personal. It brings history down to the cellular level. Both Stamped and Breathe discuss George Washington's false teeth. This morning I was brought to a complete halt by this quote from Breathe:
"George Washington's false teeth were not wood, as you may have heard. They were actually made from .a variety of materials,including Black humans' teeth. The father of our country stole our teeth. Our bite. Think about that. What did Washington feel and think when the dentist inexpertly shoved Africans' teeth into his mouth. Was it the anxious trepidation one feels with a sloppy technology, or just one in many rituals of taking every bit of use value from the Africans? Did they pull them off cadavers, like entitled grave robbers, or was it a form of torture? One of the many rituals of slavery?
...The fear of body snatchers is warranted." (pp. 112-113 of my kindle version)
We recoil from the Nazis, but this is a lot closer to home.
I guess I am sorry that this is a tough post, but, again, we need to wake up. I wanted to touch on one more thing this morning. We often hear that protesting is fine, but why do "they" have to be violent? I have two answers this morning, one from right now, and one from history. The historical one is taken from a discussion of the successful rebellion of Haiti in Stamped: "As historian C. L. R. James explained in the 1930's, "they were seeking their salvation in the most obvious way, the destruction of what they knew was the cause of their sufferings; and if they destroyed much it was because they had suffered much.'" We need to think about that. Today's answer comes from the Chicago Tribune, in an column called "Today's social justice movement was born out of anger, not hope. There's nothing peaceful about it." I recommend it.